who will win general election

DADesign · Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: who will win general election

I was wondering,

who might we assume to win in the next coming 13th general election around 2013...

would the people vote for the opposition again.
Seemingly we could lost of uncertainy and splitting/ disunity among the opposition who won in recent year

what do you think?

mrmoto · Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject:

Only the most uninformed would see the present situation as "splitting/ disunity among the opposition". It is obvious that the recent outbursts by the likes of Zukifly Noordin, Zahrain Mohd Hashim and the antics of Hassan Ali and others are meant to give the impression there are rumblings of dissatisfaction in the rank & file of the opposition. These are BN plants and trojan horses meant to cause mayhem and havoc within the party. They took down Perak. Now they are trying to take down Penang and Selangor. Do you think this is "splitting/ disunity among the opposition" or is there a hidden hand involved? Don't forget a couple of million ringgits can buy lots of things!

The rampant abuse of power gets worse by the day and when the judiciary, police, MACC etc are seriously compromised who do you think the informed voter will vote?

With todays decision on the MB in Perak, the PM said that hopefully all will accept the decision and move on. Why didnt he say the same thing when the courts passed judgement on the use of the 'A' word? See for yourself what happened then, they appealed the judgement and got a stay of execution and then came the church firebombings! Couldnt they have accepted the courts decision and moved on?

And what about Kugan, TBH, jet engines, Scorpene submarines, Altantuya etc.

To understand just how seriously the judiciary has been compromised go and read the recent articles written by ex-judge NH Chan.

So you tell me, "would the people vote for the opposition again."?

___________________________________________________________________

Did the Federal Court contradict itself in Perak MB ruling?

By Debra Chong

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 9 — The Federal Court today may have denied Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin his Perak mentri besar’s post but its just-released collective written judgment is apparently riddled with contradictions, a retired judge said.

Nizar, 53, who had previously been declared the rightful mentri besar, lost the job when a three-man panel of Court of Appeal judges reversed the High Court’s decision last May 22.

The Pasir Panjang assemblyman then took it to the Federal Court and asked the Bench to address three issues based on the Perak Constitution, which, in plain English, translates to:

1. Whether the MB’s post is vacant when he did not resign; none of his peers had passed a vote of no confidence against him; he had asked the Sultan to dissolve the state assembly and start the process for fresh elections and was rejected.

2. Who decides that he has lost the confidence of the state assembly?

3. Who has the right to sack him if he refuses to resign?

The five apex court judges who replied were Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria, Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusoff and Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong.

In declaring Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir the rightful Perak MB, the coram summarised their reply, found at the end of 40-pages, as follows:
Yes. (To quote: “The answer to the first question will be in the affirmative;)
Yes. (“As for the second question, our answer is that under Article XVI(6) the question of confidence in the MB may be determined by means other than a vote of no-confidence in the LA;”)
Yes. (“As for the third question our answer is that if the MB refuses to tender the resignation of the Executive Council under Article XVI(6) the MB and the Executive Council members are deemed to have vacated their respective offices.”)

“On the face of it, it sounds like they are contradicting themselves, isn’t it?”, says Chan.

But a closer look at the full judgment, made available to reporters a few hours after the decision was pronounced in Putrajaya, showed several seemingly contradicting statements, prompting a former judge to question the soundness of the top court’s reasoning in one of the most critical cases to affect the highest law of the land — the constitution.

Datuk Chan Nyarn Hoi was puzzled at a certain section that had earlier been read out in open court by the third highest-ranking judge in the country, Chief Judge of Malaya Arifin.

“However, we would add that this is by no means the end of the matter, as it is always open to the appellant [Nizar] to bring a vote of no confidence against the respondent [Zambry] in the LA [Legislative Assembly] or make a representation to HRH [His Royal Highness the Sultan of Perak] at any time if he thinks that the respondent does not enjoy the support of the majority of the members of the LA,” it said.

To the retired Court of Appeal judge, more popularly known as NH Chan, that particular section “sounds strange”.

“On the face of it, it sounds like they are contradicting themselves, isn’t it?” the 74-year-old asked The Malaysian Insider over the phone.

“They say [Nizar] can take a vote of no confidence now, but why couldn’t they do it earlier?” he wondered.

“And if it’s really contradicting, then the whole judgment is rubbish,” he added.

Chan, who now lives in Ipoh, refrained from commenting further until he had read through the full written judgment.

____________________________________________________________________

DADesign · Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:11 am Post subject:

I've just read today's newspaper about a PKR treasurer "jumping ship" to BN side.
I was like... What the heck?? A treasurer going to the other side.

What s with all these jumping here and there???

U don't see in the US, democractic party jumping over the Republicans...
or vise versa...

The political ring in Malaysia seems so fragile and lack of loyality? That is just my thoughts.

Is either ur a BN or just the opposition...
No FENCE Sitter/ some sort right... if not why at the first place, why are you jumping here and there....

Unless an upright person finds any party not doing the right thing or unrighteous act, then perhaps he should join some other that is doing good for the Country & its people right??

If anybody has watch the old Chinese movie "The Opium war"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42kOv5uRN84

Well basically there is bribe and corruption in any system, its hard to come by with good, upright, loyal government servants or perhaps a politician now adays.

I believe the video could depict the present political ring of Malaysia